Skip to content
CoVinceObeya Back to Obeya with CoVince
Digital & hybrid

Obeya in Miro, Teams or Power BI: what works and what does not?

CoVinceNovember 9, 20264 min read

MIRO, TEAMS OR POWER BI? - comic
Comic: click to enlarge

You can build an Obeya in Miro, Teams or Power BI, and to a degree that works fine. Miro is strong as a board, Teams as a place to talk and Power BI as a place for numbers; none of the three combines everything in one wall. Here you see per tool what you get, where it chafes and when it pays to look at an environment that keeps all those parts together.

Most teams do not start with new software. They have Miro for workshops, Teams for meetings and Power BI for reporting, and wonder whether together that can be an Obeya. An honest answer: yes, with effort, if you accept the edges. Below is what each tool does well and where the seams are.

Miro: strong as a board

Good at: an infinite board, sticky notes, frames, drawing together. For a problem analysis or an A3 that is exactly what you want.

Chafes at: numbers. A KPI there is a picture or a number someone updates. The board itself does not show what is behind or overdue, and an action on a sticky note has no owner or date that comes back anywhere else.

Fits: workshops and designing the Obeya itself.

Teams: strong as a conversation space

Good at: meeting, chatting, sharing files and video calling. Almost everyone already has it.

Chafes at: the shared picture. You can share a screen, but then everyone looks at one person’s screen instead of a wall they walk through themselves. The wall itself is not in Teams: it lives somewhere else and is brought in.

Fits: the conversation around it, when the Obeya itself lives elsewhere.

Power BI: strong for numbers

Good at: data from many sources, calculations and reports that look professional. If your numbers are already there, they are well managed there.

Chafes at: everything that is not a number. A report shows that something deviates, but the action, the owner, the decision and the conversation are elsewhere. An Obeya stand-up is about what you do about it now, and that is not in the report.

Fits: the source of the numbers, not the wall itself.

Side by side

Part of an ObeyaMiroTeamsPower BIObeya in CoVince
Board to work on togetherStrongLimitedNot foundCanvas with sticky notes, shapes, arrows and charts
Numbers and trendsManual or via appsNot foundStrongTiles with KPIs, meters and trends
Seeing what is behindNot foundNot foundBy your own designCounters for behind, at risk, overdue actions, on track
Actions with owner and dateOn a sticky noteVia another appNot foundActions and timeline in the same journey
Video callingBuilt in, from the Starter plan (per Miro)StrongNot foundBuilt in, with the board in the conversation
Multiple screens as a wallBy your own set-upNot foundBy your own designControl Room on one, three or nine screens
AI that knows the numbersVariesVariesVariesCrewMate on the board, out loud too

The columns for Miro, Teams and Power BI are general and depend on your licence and your set-up. Check that against your own environment. The last column is what CoVince describes on the main page.

Obeya in CoVince: board with a timeline and an action list with owners and dates
A board with timeline and action list: every action an owner and a date.

When do you stay with what you have?

  • Your team is small and the Obeya is mainly a temporary workshop: Miro is enough.
  • Your numbers are already well managed in a reporting tool and that stays the source: keep it that way, and only look at the wall around it.
  • You first want to experience whether an Obeya works for you: start with what exists, and see after a month what chafes.

When does your own Obeya environment pay off?

When you notice you are switching between three tabs during the stand-up, that numbers and actions are not together, or that remote colleagues have a different picture from the room. Then it is worth looking at an environment where the wall, the actions, the conversation and the CrewMate are in the same journey. What you can bring in as numbers from other sources is best seen in a demo. Do not assume a specific connection exists; ask.

A checklist to assess any tool is in Choosing Obeya software. What a live wall delivers you can read in Digital Obeya, and the basics in the complete guide.

Want to see Miro, Teams and Power BI function by function next to CoVince, iObeya and Klaxoon, with sources? Read the full feature list: Obeya software compared. See the full feature list

Frequently asked questions

Can I build an Obeya in Miro?

Yes, as a board. For a problem analysis or an A3, Miro is handy. For numbers that refresh themselves and actions with owner and date you usually need something extra.

Is Teams suitable for a digital Obeya?

Teams is strong for the conversation and sharing files, but the wall itself is not in it. You share one person's screen instead of everyone walking through the same wall.

Can Power BI replace an Obeya?

Power BI is good at numbers and reports, but an Obeya also needs actions, decisions, risks and a conversation. Use it as a source of numbers, not as the whole wall.

Can I use numbers from another tool in CoVince?

The tiles take numbers from CoVince itself, from a CSV or from connected sources, or you type them in. Which sources suit you, we show in the demo.

What is the advantage of everything in one environment?

You do not switch between tabs during the stand-up: the wall, the actions, the timeline, the video calling and the CrewMate are in the same journey, and remote colleagues see the same as the room.